Hello all,
Yesterday I worked in remote with 2 PCs. One was running an INDI sever and the other Kstars and Ekos.
Both were connected via wifi. The data flow goes from 200kb/s to 1.2Mb/s between the 2 PCs.
The camera is a Nikon D5300. The size of each capture is 48Mb.
First I choose to store my images on client side and it took more than 3mn to get it on my PC. During this time no capture where done.
Next I choose to store it on local side and there were no lapse between each capture but I haven't any feed back on each captures.
I have 2 questions:
1/ In local side storage would it be possible to have a feed back through a reduced image in size and resolution to be sure that all works fine ?
I imagine a parallel process that take the final capture and crush it in jpg and half resolution and send it to a control viewer on the client screen.
2/ Or in client side storage would it be possible to have de-synchronized processes between capture and image data transmission to avoid long latency duration ?
Yesterday I worked in remote with 2 PCs. One was running an INDI sever and the other Kstars and Ekos.
Both were connected via wifi. The data flow goes from 200kb/s to 1.2Mb/s between the 2 PCs.
The camera is a Nikon D5300. The size of each capture is 48Mb.
First I choose to store my images on client side and it took more than 3mn to get it on my PC. During this time no capture where done.
Next I choose to store it on local side and there were no lapse between each capture but I haven't any feed back on each captures.
I have 2 questions:
1/ In local side storage would it be possible to have a feed back through a reduced image in size and resolution to be sure that all works fine ?
I imagine a parallel process that take the final capture and crush it in jpg and half resolution and send it to a control viewer on the client screen.
2/ Or in client side storage would it be possible to have de-synchronized processes between capture and image data transmission to avoid long latency duration ?